Monday, April 1, 2013

LA, LA, LAGUNA!


Critical commentary of space







    PASEO

Our first stop in our field trip to Laguna was at Paseo de Santa Rosa. This place was mostly outlet shops, high end boutiques, and high end restaurants. It reminded me a lot of shopping malls and walks found in west coast USA such particularly the San Diego or San Francisco areas. Even though the place is open for everyone it mainly caters to middle to upper class consumers. This was seen from the lay out of the place vast parking, sparse commuting terminals, almost inaccessible without a car and the tiange and cheaper food stall were separated and segregated from the boutiques and outlets. There is an invisible barrier that would seem to be a deterrent from lower middle class below of people from going there despite affordable prices in some shops. When you go to Paseo you go there to buy something or have something in mind to get there, it is a bit far to just go there and sit down and not spend. The division of classes is literally seen as it is divided into two parts expensive stores and restaurants in one part and cheaper goods and food stall on the other end. No need to ask or interview anyone there about who the target consumer is or what type of location it is Paseo is the Eastwood of Laguna and it mainly caters to the upper classes and marginalizes the rest whether intended or not, it is a rapidly urbanizing area that is primed for a bigger boom.





SM CALAMBA


















While Paseo may be called a niche market SM is a hodgepot or a melting pot of it all culture, food, stores, gadgets and everything else. It is accessible by both private vehicle and public transportation. Class does not matter and no one cares about what people want to do  Its a carefree, watch out for your self, do what you want environment. Unlike Paseo SM does not marginalize anyone no one feels out of place or out of range. SM also was a meeting place and a hang out of people it is where they meet and seem to spend the day walking around without necessarily buying anything which is again in contrast to Paseo where you will spend on either it on food or shopping. SM truly is the middle ground which caters to everyone.

LILIW















Liliw, Laguna is known for their foot wear product such as Slippers. The story of Liliw started with the slippers as their main attraction then after awhile they began to cater different kinds of footwear. To me it seemed as if tsinelas making was interwoven to their identity. Mom and Pop shops have been there forever it seems and are passed down from one generation to the next. They seem to have an authentic culture and that what they sell is locally authentic and viable though tainted with the globalizing touch of capitalism. Doing it the old school way like street vending and hand writing receipts, for me, is their own form of resistance. It is notable that they are evolving and that commerce is coming with the presence of 7-11 and some chicken franchises. Liliw presents it self as a self viable community that can provide for it self. They take great pride in their product and in their work ethic, though it may be difficult to get ahead because of the homogenous products they all sell.




Aerobics



















The aerobics in SM Calamba and UPLB in my view were vastly different though they were called the same. In SM Calamaba it was mostly middle to elderly women present with about 4 to 5 males and they all seem to know each other. There is an entrance price or requirement and there is a coded uniform system. The area of the aerobics seemed to be highlighted and segregated. It also seemed restrictive because the participants did not have enough space. The music was POP oriented with hit songs and dances being incorporated into the routine, in seemed a gentle and basic routine which allowed for maximum participation.
In UPLB it was different, people did not seem to know each other, it was free entry, no uniform, and the routine was harder. It was my first time to participate in aerobics and boy was I surprised. It worked up a good sweat for me and my class mates who participated. The routine was a combination of basic exercises, stretches, squats, and folk dance incorporation. It was more difficult than the one at SM calamba. The music was a combination of older beat and native music. It was a great and new experience that allowed for deeper understanding of sub-genre in aerobics.





Laguna, Una sa lahat!

We were able to meet the Governor of Laguna and had an opportunity to hear his work, platforms, plans of government, achievements, and governing strategies. I was impressed and saw that he took pride in serving and that he enjoyed what he was doing. The talk about preparedness in calamities and accountability really impressed me. Though the Governor has become a cultural commodity he has remained steadfast to his duty and has even used his popularity to increase the popularity and viability of Laguna. It was a great honor and experience to see first hand what a good public official can do and achieve. 




Rowdy Ronda Rousey


Critical analysis and the Comodification and Deconstruction of Ronda Rousey

Who is Ronda?

” Everybody’s acting like it’s a Miss America beauty pageant out there, and to be as politically correct and not piss anybody off, and like walking on egg shells. "


Ronda Jean Rousey (born February 1, 1987) is an American mixed martial artist and judoka. She is the first and current UFC Women's Bantamweight Champion, as well as the former Strikeforce Women's Bantamweight Champion. She has defeated all of her opponents by armbar in the first round. Rousey became the first American woman to earn an Olympic medal in Judo at the Summer Olympics in Beijing in 2008. Rousey made her mixed martial arts debut as an amateur on August 6, 2010. She defeated Hayden Munoz by submission due to an armbar in 23 seconds. Rousey made her professional mixed martial arts debut on March 27, 2011 at King of the Cage: Turning Point. She submitted Ediane Gomes with an armbar in 25 seconds. Rousey faced kickboxing champion Charmaine Tweet in an MMA bout at Hard Knocks Fighting Championship: School of Hard Knocks 12 on June 17, 2011 in Canada, She submitted Tweet with an armbar in 49 seconds. All of her wins have come in the FIRST ROUND AND ALL BY ARMBAR. Yah that’s not a typo she is dominant and has taken the women’s division by storm.




Rowdy as always
The fact that Dana White just handed Rousey a belt shows that the UFC sort of fell into the cult of personality Rousey has developed.  Rousey has attracted a lot of attention for a fighter, who is really just starting a career 7W-0L, and she has attracted a lot on entourage and she has broken a lot of barriers.  White, rather than invest in a women’s division, has gone all in on Rousey.  If it doesn’t work out, look for the UFC to fold the women MMA early which adds more pressure on her but she just take it all in stride.
Rousey is notable for introducing trash talking to Women's MMA. In many interviews Rousey has used harsh language and openly downplayed the abilities of her opponents. Rousey doesn't deny the accusations and is not apologetic for something she explains is a way to generate more publicity for the sport. She has also spoken with ridicule of fellow Olympian Michael Phelps and Kim Kardashian.
“I'm like screw everyone's idea of 'oh what sports are supposed to be like” said Rousey. “I did what sports were supposed to be like, and I was living in my car. So you know what, fine. I'm gonna talk a bunch of s**t. I'm gonna pose in a couple of pictures. And I'm gonna break a couple of girl's arms, and I'm not gonna feel the least bit sorry about it because you know what? At least I can feed my dog.”
 Analysis
It is fir to say that Ronda Rousey is tougher than most women I know, to be honest tougher than most guys I know. She is an enigma that keeps on enchanting the people with her soft and friendly side tempered with her fierce warrior attitude in the cage she has shown that women fighters do have a place in mainstream MMA. She is shroud in controversy because of her comments and never backs down. She is a symbol that proves that women cannot and will not be denied the opportunities to prove themselves. Ronda has opened doors not only for herself but also for others. The UFC, previously sceptics of women’s mixed martial arts, now believe that the they possess an equal, if not superior technical ability and positioning them as the main event, with male former champions as co-main events shows their commitment to that belief. This quick integration of female competitors in the same spotlight as their male counterparts is almost unheard of in any other sport. There is also a lack of feminist empowerment support that surrounds her which surprises me. I would have thought that she would have been the perfect person for feminist movements to approach and use yet they have not yet done so. So let me be one of the first to get it out there. She is picture of women empowerment. She is someone who trains with men on the highest level of the sport. She has became an icon of not only women MMA but MMA in general. What ever people think about her that she is famous coz she is pretty or sexy or coz she did a photo shoot with ESPN does not matter to her and she will tell you all about it in no uncertain terms. She brings something new and fresh without being a novelty. She is a true credit to the sport.

If someone wants to play Twitter war with me, I'm the wrong person to mess with. I come from a family of a lot of quick-witted and accomplished women.


I wasn't looking to make friends in this sport. I just wanted to make a living so I didn't have to catch coins. But it doesn't matter if people don't like me because it's mostly current or former champs who think everyone should throw petals at their feet. Honestly, I don't care if a bunch of girls I don't know don't like me. I'm doing this to support myself and not work night shifts at the gym. 


Image sources:
http://blog.betdsi.com/ronda-rousey-and-the-ufc-perfect-together/


Indigenous Filipino Critical Commentary



Virgilio Enriquez, The Father of Sikolohiyang Pilipino, Sought to reorient psychology from being an alleged “neutral” and “value free” social science to one that is cognizant of the politics behind Western theorizing. He also proposed that Proposed that a culturally-appropriate science of psychology attuned to the nuances and differing cultural characteristics of the Filipino. He accounted for and focused on own voices, own and other thoughts, and other local authors and sources. Basically what he did in lay mans terms was get the western ideology, take it crumple it, throw it out the window, and said nice try but you don’t know jack s#!T AND THAT WE FILIPINOS SO HAVE OUR OWN THEORIES AND IDEOLOGIES. It is a form of resistance it could be seen as weapons of the weak or subversive means but I would rather see this as a resistance on a grand scale and ideological revolution if one may so call it. It is the assertion and declaration that here we are as Filipinos this is how we see ourselves, and how you may better understand us, you got part of us wrong but we do not discount what you have contributed but we have a better understanding of ourselves you connote crab mentality or talangka as bad we show you how in the context of those who understand it is not pulling each other down but a call of understanding the indebtedness to ones community and about loyalty and respect.  Bahala na is known as a negative connotation equivalent to the flippant answer of ‘whatever’ but as Filipinos we usually use more of as an self-motivating, courage boosting, morale lifting expression to allow ourselves that push to do something we are nervous or scared to do. Its a verbal shot of Dutch courage.
 
Zeus Salazar allowed for the Filipinos to do something special and revolutionary, the Pantayong Pananaw gives access to Filipinos to look at themselves through their own lenses, through their own magnifying glass without being filtered by western or foreign understanding or interpretation. It is an inclusive look and explanation of who we are as we see ourselves from within and show us how to understand ourselves. We have so long been told by others of who we are that we stopped answering it ourselves and started letting them define us. This indigenous narratives allow for us to say TAYO naman ang magkwento kung sino tayo sa pananaw natin para malaman nila!




Post-Colonialism Critical Commentary


Colonialism is defined as the establishment, exploitation, maintenance, acquisition and expansion of colonies in one territory by people from another territory also it is unequal relationships between the colonists and the indigenous population.
   


Based on our studies in the class room it is also a form of othering and brain washing. The colonizers change who you are, they tell you what to be, they give you a mental picture of a new you, then that becomes you, but the catch is the person they made you become is them and not you. Confusing? Welcome to the colonial brainwashing and how to subvert the whole ideology of an indigenous people, to want to change their whole concept of self to match the description that someone half way across the world so that they would feel less inferior and throw away what makes them who they are. The colonizers even attributed traits and pre diagnosed analysis of why indigenous people are failure or why they will fail.  The description by the colonizers to the orient their inferior other. They are degenerate, lazy, weak, lustful criminals, and shady immoral character The sexes are generalized as follows oriental male is inherently lazy and murderously violent, while the oriental female is promiscuous, immodest and sexual licentious. These are description of the occident to the orient and thus they implanted their image and the influence is still seen today.







Majors products and advertisements still feature westernized or western heavy featured celebrities or endorsers to carry the product not because people Filipinos see themselves in the advertisers but rather allow their inferiority or wanting to look like them lead them to patronize these. As if they buy these products they become part of that or they change somehow. In the Philippines white is the color of beauty that everyone aspires to, hence the strong markets of papaya soaps or glutha.


   










 I was very happy to see successful brands hiring dare I say more Filipino looking advertisers. They have good features are on successful and popular brands such as Surf and Tandauy Ice and have given creed that white is not the only game out there and that Filipino beauty is and should be appreciated. Is it possible that the western looking advertisers are the others? As of now I doubt it but we never know in the future we may all be brown because of the hybridity and the mixing of races and cultures so who then will be the other? How can we tell? I hope we cannot and maybe we can live in a much more harmonious world. It never hurts to dream so lets all just hope.




Image sources:









Western Critical Commentary




In class we have gone into detailed and deep discussions about various western theories from capitalism, to socialism to feminism. I would like to provide my critical commentary and analysis on capitalism because it is what I have grown to know, to understand, and to identify myself with.

      Capitalism as defined by our class discussions and presentations is a condition where all means of production are owned privately therefore allowing the power to make decisions and earn profits solely in the hands of the private owners. Capitalism as seen throughout the world can be both good and bad. Capitalism is seen and associated for the most part to western and to industrially advanced countries. There are many who believe however that all it stands for is evil and that it is the evil that rots society. The saying that ‘the rich get richer while the poor get poorer’ certainly is an accurate description of the prime evil of capitalism but there is more to it than that. Capitalism, is generally agreed by most people, encourages growth rates and that is not in question. The debate that is present to date is the cost and manner in which it is achieved in. In our contemporary times we will not easily see a purely capitalist nature economy being run or accepted by the state. More countries are now adapting laws and policies to regulate capitalism and ushering in a mixed type of economy of both public and private ownership which I strongly agree too. Mixed economies may be the perfect temperament to combine pure capitalistic nature of all things private and communism or socialisms stark contrast of the emphasis of production and ownership being left in the hands of the state.
   
The Good
  The question now begs answering is it good or bad? Let us see the arguments from both side of the coin starting with the good. Capitalism is an efficient method of allocating resources to where they give the highest ROI or return in investments. As an example a company here in the Philippines will not build a power plant if there is no viable returns of their capital and profits to be made, simply put they will not spend. On the other hand if resources and capital are run by the state and the government mandate this project saying they will allocate this amount and this amount only or increase it in perpetuity until it is done, what ever edict the state has decided that is what they will do whether it is worth while or not. So a non-capitalist state has the possibility of seeing all the power and means of production fall into the hands of bureaucrats who may use the money as intended or use it for self gain. This is the main advantage of capitalism, it can prevent this from happening and instead gives the power to the people, the entrepreneurs who are driven by their own personal needs and the needs of the market. This will lead to a chain of events that will allow the entrepreneur to create and enhance production to earn profits, which (though inadvertently) will allow the economy to surge ahead as a whole. This will allow the economy to open up with a greater deal of competition, and this competition will benefit both the competitors and the consumers as it allows for low barriers to entry and perfect competition (ideal scenario). With this set up the members of society are incentivised to work and create their own success and get a slice of the proverbial pie. This decentralized system of operation is good for everyone involved. Consumers are given choices and they are free to do as they please with their hard earned money. The society in general becomes more liberated and standard of living goes up. With all these in mind it seems hard to imagine that capitalism could actually be bad.



   The Bad
   Well it can and these are the arguments against capitalism.  They tend to form monopolies and monopolies are bad. Capitalism tends to concentrate their resources towards these institutions and the more efficient tend to drive the less efficient out of the market. SM and PLDT are examples though monopolies in the Philippines are quite abundant. Capitalism also puts labor force at a disadvantage of sorts, especially if there is a surplus in labor and when the cost go high they move somewhere cheaper and leave those labourers jobless. The bigger capitalists such as Multinational companies and Monopolies tend to be the ones who exploit their workers. Another drawback is that when monopolies and large companies have gained foot hold they can prohibit the entry of competition by monopolizing resources and when this happens, the virtues and ideals espoused above are destroyed but sadly this is a real occurrence in the Philippines and also in the world. Another negative that is said by the detractors of capitalism is that a capitalist economy becomes very materialistic and money oriented in nature, and this affects peoples of the country morally and spiritually. To apply this in the Philippines I will say that the effect is not a big explosion and a massive paradigm shift but can be compared to a slow mild poison slowly seeping in. When this happens economic disparities rise, which in turn breeds social out casting and criminality in order to sustain themselves in a consumer society. Overall the society suffers negatively and it is something that we do not need. The biggest draw back is exploitation as people want to earn more and more then more is given up. Natural resources, human resources, and others this leads to severe consequences in the long run. So how can something so evil be good.

.


My Take
The answer on whether capitalism is good or bad lies entirely upon the country it is in. No matter where it is in the world there will always be good companies and corporations that seek to improve lives and give quality service and bad corporations that may try to take advantage of the system and abuse laws and resources and then there are those in between who just comply with the existing law. That is the problem in the Philippines there is still a hole when it comes to regulation of capitalism. There are still no Anti-trust laws or other mechanisms that can comprehensively protect against systematic abuse in the name of business and profit. Capitalism has been adapted throughout the world and has taken a new shape a mixed economy (Philippines had this, sort of) where the aim is for a mutually beneficial cooperation between capitalism and socialism. This allows for the opening of the economy whilst providing a shield for the poor from exploitation.
There is no definite answer to whether capitalism is good or bad because it all boils down to where you are and how it is set in place and if the state has ensured safe guards and mechanisms to be in place to stop exploitation. There are advantages and disadvantages to capitalism and to label it good or bad is simply not possible. Be the judge yourself and take a look around.

                                                                                

RESISTANCE




    Life is a long and exciting journey that is filled with obstacles and difficulties and we often find ourselves in positions of subordination be it being children, younger siblings, nephews/nieces, students, athletes, or employees. The question is how do I resist? In a recent class discussion we delved into the weapons of the weak or subversive methods and as the discussion went further along I identified with some if not most of the things that were being described. For example to our parents we use silence as a weapon and allow them to believe that they have won the argument, feign ignorance or misinformation when the professor asks for due dates, laziness in our daily chores in order to get others to do it, or more insidious tactics such as sabotage and gossip to really do some damage. These are the new forms of resistance that I learned today that gave a wider meaning to resistance to the typical understanding I had which is wars, revolutions, and mass ralies.

   For my self I have knowingly resisted but unknowingly used these methods. My most memorable resistance  is the choosing of my college course I started of in the college of business where I really did not want to enrol but since we have a family business and someone needs to take over after my father I choose a course there and got in. I have to admit I am really weak when it comes to numbers and they give me nightmares especially algebra at first this was a cause of concern but after a few days of thinking I realized if I failed these and showed my father he would only have three choices and I knew I would get what I wanted those option were a. I try and fail and get kicked out b. Transfer school (which my dad would not want) or c. Change courses and I would make some sort of concession (my preferred action and designed plan). So after talks and discussion and much to my fathers chagrin and further negotiations that I wanted a Liberal arts course but I have to take a masters in business then I was allowed to transfer to one of my fathers three choices which were Psychology, Philosophy, or Political Science. I had always had an interest in Political science and so that is what I chose and here I am today.